← Compare others

Pinochet (Chile military rule), as realized, 1973-1990vs.Fascism, as stated, 20th c.

Proximity: Same family

16 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 99% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 16 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. Direct opposition appears on 1 dimension and 9 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Assigned Groups: Pinochet (Chile military rule) is balanced where Fascism strongly supports. Both hold Authority & Hierarchy, Security & Stability, and 6 more as core commitments.


Clusters

Pinochet (Chile military rule)Extractive Rule

Tradition & Continuity leads the elevations, with Authority & Hierarchy, Material Aspiration, and Security & Stability high beside it, while Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare are strongly depressed and the procedural Principles run low. Elevated Material Aspiration is the distinctive marker among the hierarchical clusters. What separates it from Mobilized Absolutism is degree: the depressions here are shallower and the elevations less extreme.

FascismMobilized Absolutism

Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare show the deepest depressions in the collection, with the procedural Principles low beside them, while Authority & Hierarchy carries the single strongest elevation anywhere in it, joined by Assigned Groups, Security & Stability, and Community & Solidarity. Both sides of the pattern run to their extremes. That depth on both sides is what separates it from Extractive Rule.


Where they sit


Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Pinochet (Chile military rule), as realized, 1973-1990 leadsFascism, as stated, 20th c. leads
V
V
V
P
V
V
V
V
V
P
V

11 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.