← Compare others

Chicago School Economics, as stated, 1950s-presentvs.Monetarism, as stated, 1950s-present

Proximity: Same family

15 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 99.1% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 15 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. 5 differ in degree rather than direction and on 2 dimensions one profile engages a question the other sets aside. The sharpest split is Assigned Groups: Chicago School Economics strongly opposes where Monetarism is indifferent.


Clusters

Both:Liberty First

Liberty is the defining elevation, with Consent & Anti-Coercion running high beside it; Authority & Hierarchy sits low. Individual freedom leads the profile rather than any collective commitment.


Where they sit


Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Chicago School Economics, as stated, 1950s-present leadsMonetarism, as stated, 1950s-present leads
V
P
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
V
P

10 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.