← Compare others

Chicago School Economics, as stated, 1950s-presentvs.The Wealth of Nations (Smith), as stated, 1776

Proximity: Same family

14 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 99.5% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 14 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. Direct opposition appears on 1 dimension and 5 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Progress & Innovation: Chicago School Economics is balanced where The Wealth of Nations (Smith) strongly supports.


Clusters

Both:Liberty First

Liberty is the defining elevation, with Consent & Anti-Coercion running high beside it; Authority & Hierarchy sits low. Individual freedom leads the profile rather than any collective commitment.


Where they sit


Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Chicago School Economics, as stated, 1950s-present leadsThe Wealth of Nations (Smith), as stated, 1776 leads
V
V
V
P
P
P
V
V
V
V

12 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.