← Compare others

Logical Positivism, as stated, 1920s-1950svs.The Wealth of Nations (Smith), as stated, 1776

Proximity: Neighbors

20 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 95% of all pairs.

These are close neighbors, a difference of 20 on the 0 to 100 scale. Their differences spread across both values and principles. Direct opposition appears on 1 dimension, 5 differ in degree rather than direction, and on 2 dimensions one profile engages a question the other sets aside. The sharpest split is Inclusiveness & Pluralism: Logical Positivism leans against where The Wealth of Nations (Smith) leans toward.

Clusters

Both:Liberty First

Liberty is the defining elevation, with Consent & Anti-Coercion running high beside it; Authority & Hierarchy sits low. Individual freedom leads the profile rather than any collective commitment.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
*V
V
V
V
V
*P
*P
*P
P
P
P
P
P

* Not counted in the distance: one side is not scored on this dimension.

Where the gaps are

Logical Positivism, as stated, 1920s-1950s leadsThe Wealth of Nations (Smith), as stated, 1776 leads
P
P
V
P
V
P
V
V
V
P
V
V
V

5 dimensions identical; 4 not compared.