← Compare others

Myanmar Military Junta, as realized, 1962-presentvs.Pinochet (Chile military rule), as realized, 1973-1990

Proximity: Same family

15 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 99.0% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 15 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. Direct opposition appears on 2 dimensions and 5 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Progress & Innovation: Myanmar Military Junta strongly opposes where Pinochet (Chile military rule) leans toward. Both hold Authority & Hierarchy, Security & Stability, and 7 more as core commitments.

Clusters

Both:Extractive Rule

Tradition & Continuity leads the elevations, with Authority & Hierarchy, Material Aspiration, and Security & Stability high beside it, while Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare are strongly depressed and the procedural Principles run low. Elevated Material Aspiration is the distinctive marker among the hierarchical clusters. What separates it from Mobilized Absolutism is degree: the depressions here are shallower and the elevations less extreme.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Myanmar Military Junta, as realized, 1962-present leadsPinochet (Chile military rule), as realized, 1973-1990 leads
P
V
V
V
V
V
V
V

14 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.