← Compare others

National Populism (contemporary), as stated, 2010-presentvs.Christian Nationalism (US), as stated, contemporary

Proximity: Same family

12 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 99.8% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 12 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. 7 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Sanctity & Transcendence: National Populism (contemporary) leans toward where Christian Nationalism (US) holds it as a core commitment. Both hold Community & Solidarity as a core commitment.

Clusters

Both:Extractive Rule

Tradition & Continuity leads the elevations, with Authority & Hierarchy, Material Aspiration, and Security & Stability high beside it, while Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare are strongly depressed and the procedural Principles run low. Elevated Material Aspiration is the distinctive marker among the hierarchical clusters. What separates it from Mobilized Absolutism is degree: the depressions here are shallower and the elevations less extreme.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

National Populism (contemporary), as stated, 2010-present leadsChristian Nationalism (US), as stated, contemporary leads
V
P
V
V
P
P
V
V
V

13 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.