← Compare others

National Populism (contemporary), as stated, 2010-presentvs.Right-wing Populism, as stated, 20th c.-present

Proximity: Same family

4 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 99.9% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 4 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. 1 differs in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Rule of Law & Consistency: National Populism (contemporary) leans against where Right-wing Populism strongly opposes. Both hold Security & Stability and Community & Solidarity as core commitments.

Clusters

Both:Extractive Rule

Tradition & Continuity leads the elevations, with Authority & Hierarchy, Material Aspiration, and Security & Stability high beside it, while Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare are strongly depressed and the procedural Principles run low. Elevated Material Aspiration is the distinctive marker among the hierarchical clusters. What separates it from Mobilized Absolutism is degree: the depressions here are shallower and the elevations less extreme.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

National Populism (contemporary), as stated, 2010-present leadsRight-wing Populism, as stated, 20th c.-present leads
P

21 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.