← Compare others

Quakerism, as stated, 17th c.-presentvs.A Theory of Justice (Rawls), as stated, 1971

Proximity: Neighbors

20 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 95% of all pairs.

These are close neighbors, a difference of 20 on the 0 to 100 scale. Their differences spread across both values and principles. 13 differ in degree rather than direction and on a single dimension one profile engages a question the other sets aside. The sharpest split is Sanctity & Transcendence: Quakerism holds it as a core commitment where A Theory of Justice (Rawls) is indifferent. Both hold Consent & Anti-Coercion and Assigned Groups as core commitments.

Clusters

Both:Egalitarian Pluralists

Equality and Inclusiveness & Pluralism rise together at the top of the profile, with Assigned Groups low. Standing is extended broadly rather than allocated by role or origin.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Quakerism, as stated, 17th c.-present leadsA Theory of Justice (Rawls), as stated, 1971 leads
V
P
P
V
V
V
V
V
P
V
V
V
V
V
P
V
P

5 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.