← Compare others

Shareholder Capitalism, as stated, 1970s-presentvs.Neoliberalism, as stated, late 20th c.-present

Proximity: Same family

17 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 98% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 17 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. Direct opposition appears on 3 dimensions and 4 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Authority & Hierarchy: Shareholder Capitalism leans toward where Neoliberalism leans against.

Clusters

Shareholder CapitalismPragmatic Achievement

Defined by elevated Evidence-Based Reasoning, with Achievement & Excellence, Material Aspiration, and Progress & Innovation running high alongside it. Sanctity & Transcendence and Tradition & Continuity sit low. The pattern is secular and outcome-focused: performance and evidence over inherited forms.

NeoliberalismLiberty First

Liberty is the defining elevation, with Consent & Anti-Coercion running high beside it; Authority & Hierarchy sits low. Individual freedom leads the profile rather than any collective commitment.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Shareholder Capitalism, as stated, 1970s-present leadsNeoliberalism, as stated, late 20th c.-present leads
V
V
V
P
V
P
V
V
P
P
V

11 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.