← Compare others

Social Anarchism (classical), as stated, 1860-1920vs.Occupy Wall Street, as realized, 2011-2012

Proximity: Same family

18 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 97% of all pairs.

These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 18 on the 0 to 100 scale. Their differences spread across both values and principles. 10 differ in degree rather than direction and on 2 dimensions one profile engages a question the other sets aside. The sharpest split is Liberty: Social Anarchism (classical) holds it as a core commitment where Occupy Wall Street leans toward. Both hold Authority & Hierarchy and Equality as core commitments.

Clusters

Social Anarchism (classical)Transformative Command

Its loudest feature is a floor across the procedural Principles: Rule of Law & Consistency, Transparency & Honesty, Inclusiveness & Pluralism, and Non-Maleficence all strongly depressed, with Authority & Hierarchy elevated. Existing constraints give way to directed change.

Occupy Wall StreetEgalitarian Pluralists

Equality and Inclusiveness & Pluralism rise together at the top of the profile, with Assigned Groups low. Standing is extended broadly rather than allocated by role or origin.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Social Anarchism (classical), as stated, 1860-1920 leadsOccupy Wall Street, as realized, 2011-2012 leads
V
P
P
V
V
V
P
V
V
P
V
P
P
P
V

7 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.