← Compare others

Tea Party Movement, as realized, 2009-2016vs.English Bill of Rights, as stated, 1689

Proximity: Neighbors

24 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 85% of all pairs.

These are close neighbors, a difference of 24 on the 0 to 100 scale. They hold similar values but part ways on the rules. Direct opposition appears on 3 dimensions, 5 differ in degree rather than direction, and on 3 dimensions one profile engages a question the other sets aside. The sharpest split is Transparency & Honesty: Tea Party Movement strongly opposes where English Bill of Rights leans toward.

Clusters

Tea Party MovementExtractive Rule

Tradition & Continuity leads the elevations, with Authority & Hierarchy, Material Aspiration, and Security & Stability high beside it, while Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare are strongly depressed and the procedural Principles run low. Elevated Material Aspiration is the distinctive marker among the hierarchical clusters. What separates it from Mobilized Absolutism is degree: the depressions here are shallower and the elevations less extreme.

English Bill of RightsLiberty First

Liberty is the defining elevation, with Consent & Anti-Coercion running high beside it; Authority & Hierarchy sits low. Individual freedom leads the profile rather than any collective commitment.

Where they sit

Full detail

Core oppositionCore support
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

Where the gaps are

Tea Party Movement, as realized, 2009-2016 leadsEnglish Bill of Rights, as stated, 1689 leads
V
V
V
P
V
V
V
V
P
P
P
V
P
P
P

7 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.