Proximity: Same family
19 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 96% of all pairs.
These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 19 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. Direct opposition appears on 2 dimensions and 3 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Achievement & Excellence: Maoist China strongly opposes where Lenin (Soviet leadership) leans toward. Both hold Authority & Hierarchy, Consent & Anti-Coercion, and 11 more as core commitments.
Clusters
Maoist ChinaTransformative Command
Its loudest feature is a floor across the procedural Principles: Rule of Law & Consistency, Transparency & Honesty, Inclusiveness & Pluralism, and Non-Maleficence all strongly depressed, with Authority & Hierarchy elevated. Existing constraints give way to directed change.
Lenin (Soviet leadership)Mobilized Absolutism
Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare show the deepest depressions in the collection, with the procedural Principles low beside them, while Authority & Hierarchy carries the single strongest elevation anywhere in it, joined by Assigned Groups, Security & Stability, and Community & Solidarity. Both sides of the pattern run to their extremes. That depth on both sides is what separates it from Extractive Rule.
Where they sit
Full detail
Where the gaps are
16 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.