Proximity: Same family
19 on a scale of 0 (close) to 100 (far). Closer than 96% of all pairs.
These are profiles of the same family, a difference of 19 on the 0 to 100 scale. They differ little in what they value and in the rules they hold. Direct opposition appears on 2 dimensions and 3 differ in degree rather than direction. The sharpest split is Achievement & Excellence: Lenin (Soviet leadership) leans toward where Maoist China strongly opposes. Both hold Authority & Hierarchy, Consent & Anti-Coercion, and 11 more as core commitments.
Clusters
Lenin (Soviet leadership)Mobilized Absolutism
Knowledge & Truth and Care & Welfare show the deepest depressions in the collection, with the procedural Principles low beside them, while Authority & Hierarchy carries the single strongest elevation anywhere in it, joined by Assigned Groups, Security & Stability, and Community & Solidarity. Both sides of the pattern run to their extremes. That depth on both sides is what separates it from Extractive Rule.
Maoist ChinaTransformative Command
Its loudest feature is a floor across the procedural Principles: Rule of Law & Consistency, Transparency & Honesty, Inclusiveness & Pluralism, and Non-Maleficence all strongly depressed, with Authority & Hierarchy elevated. Existing constraints give way to directed change.
Where they sit
Full detail
Where the gaps are
16 dimensions identical; 0 not compared.